Getting ranked #1 in Google for those heavily searched, relevant keywords is the dream of every Webmaster.
And if you’ve been around for a while, you know that task is not as easy as it once was.
Years ago you could stuff keywords, hide content in your background and perform all kinds of tricks to get you ranked at or near the top.
Nowadays you have to work much harder to get that Google love.
And who could blame Google for making it more difficult to rank high? They are successful because they deliver useful, relevant results.
So why wouldn’t they protect their brand from tricksters and spammers out to make a quick buck?
While you probably know about the basic ways of getting a good ranking in Google (high-quality inbound links, relevant content, etc.) many people believe Google is using other tools to see how you measure up and help determine your rank.
And if you ask me, it makes perfect sense.
Your Feed Activity
In case you didn’t know, Google owns FeedBurner (an RSS feed distribution & reporting service.)
So if you have a blog that uses Feedburner to promote, track and manage your feed, wouldn’t it make sense that Google monitors those subscription numbers and feed activity?
This is why I think it’s so important that your blog lives on the same domain as your site. Make it easy for Google to make the connection.
Google is a Registrar
In 2005, Google outwardly admitted they use their Registrar status to help improve the quality of their search results.
So if two of your sites got banned from spamming and they were both registered under the same name, what do you think will happen when you try to promote a 3rd site in Google that has the same registration data?
On the flip side, say someone has 3 heavily trafficked sites that rank well in Google. Wouldn’t it make sense that additional sites registered by that same person could have an added advantage in the long-run since the other 3 sites have some Google love?
Hmmmm……
Google Owns YouTube
Say you’ve got a YouTube channel with 794 subscribers, 300,000 video views and your channel homepage links to your main site. A pretty active channel, I’d say.
Why wouldn’t Google take this into consideration in determining your site’s credibility?
I’ve been using YouTube since August 2007 and while I have no proof using it has affected my rankings, it only makes sense that having a heavily trafficked YouTube channel linked to my website helps show Google that I am a credible source in my niche.
Google Analytics
What better way to prove to Google you are worthy by letting them see your traffic data. If you have a Google Analytics account then Google now has access to your visitor information.
Now, if you’re site is new and your traffic is low don’t panic and feel you should remove the code until you get more traffic. I don’t think using it will hurt you.
But when your site does start to generate traffic from other sources, wouldn’t you want Google to see that?
Now, we all know you don’t need Google Analytics installed on your site for Google to see who’s linking to you, but what if 75% of your traffic is bookmark traffic?
That kind of traffic data is not taken into consideration with backlinks and PageRank. Wouldn’t you want Google to know that these loyal people are visiting your site regularly?
There’s No Concrete Proof
While there is no way to know how Google uses the above information, let’s be realistic here…
If there are two sites with relatively the same content but one site has an RSS feed tracked by FeedBurner with 2,000 subscribers, a YouTube channel with 30 videos and 130,000 views, and 10,000 visits per day tracked by Google Analytics, while the other site has no blog, no videos and fewer visitors…
Which one do you think Google will respect more?
Granted, the above items may not have a very large influence on a site’s rank (yet), but you better believe they play a role…. especially when it comes down to determining the value of competing sites with similar content.
Why wouldn’t Google put all these pieces together?
These days you’ve got to work harder than ever to prove your worth to Google, so why not make use of the tools they own and monitor?
Donald says
Well I created another Google account after thinking about this some more. Maybe I can use them like they use me. If they are going to spy on me the least they can do is help my website get some hits. LOL
Donald says
Google is definitely spying. Why build a network of capabilities and not be tempted to use them for the government or corporate entities? I terminated my account with them because I fear their intentions. Google is becoming too powerful on the internet and can basically censor content by not ranking it high.
chris says
Yes it makes sense, but this is not a bad thing, as the saying goes, “Those with nothing to hide need not worry.
Evra says
Thanks for the article Lisa…I’m just starting a new website and I think this information really helped me. Will be launching in about two months and I just have to bulk up on my content. Thanks again for this great information
road2technology says
very useful article. google is the best search engine when u compare it to yahoo, bing or others
siddharth says
I found some clues . They’re confirmed . Google is spying for sure .
http://hphacks.blogspot.com/2010/02/5-clue-to-google-spy-theory.html
.-= siddharth´s last blog … 5 clue to ‘google a spy’ theory =-.
work online says
I think your theory is plausible. We could fairly say that overall traffic and the quantity of bookmarking also play a role when trying to get Google’s love. – Javier.
Theresa says
Thanks Lisa. That is a terrific post and some things to think about that I hadn’t taken into consideration. I didn’t know that Google owned Feedburner.
Gavin says
I think we’d be very naive to think Google didn’t use their own collected data on our accounts. Its essential for them to mine our data to help improve the services they provide.
As you pointed out, we really should be making more use of their services it makes sense considering what they do own.